Data-Driven Fault Detection in Turbojet Engines: Benchmarking Temporal SVM Against State-of-the-Art Models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30537/sjet.v8i2.1691Keywords:
Fault Detection, Turbojet Engines, Temporal Support Vector Machines (T-SVM), Machine Learning, Data-Driven ApproachesAbstract
The detection of faults within turbojet engines represents an absolute necessity for operational safety and performance since failure to identify faults can lead to destructive system collapses. Real-time monitoring becomes possible through data-driven methods because they replace physical models which depend on system identification. The research presents T-SVM as a new framework for turbojet engine shaft speed fault detection through comparison with static SVM, XGBoost, Autoencoders and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks. The T-SVM algorithm uses Temporal Feature Enhancement (TFE) feature extraction technique with a 3-time-step delay to process experimental data containing an 18% fault rate. T-SVM demonstrates an accuracy level of 76.3% ± 23.5% and F1-score level of 0.51 ± 0.33 and AUC of 0.68 ± 0.27 during cross-validation with Bayesian hyperparameter optimization. This performance surpasses static SVM (59.4% ± 37.9% accuracy) by 16.9% but trails XGBoost (90.6% ± 1.3%), Autoencoders (90.7% ± 1.2%), and LSTM (90.7% ± 0.9%) due to their superior The T-SVM model shows high potential for real-time safety-critical usage because its true positive detection reaches 96.7% and its inference runs in under 0.01 seconds. Time-series analysis confirms how T-SVM identifies faulty sections when operating under varied conditions. The presented study demonstrates the trade-offs in fault detection based on data and recommends T-SVM as a powerful method which can be optimized by ensemble strategies to improve generalization capabilities.
Downloads
References
Tavakolpour-Saleh, A. R., Nasib, S. A. R., Sepasyan, A., & Hashemi, S. M. (2015). Parametric and nonparametric system identification of an experimental turbojet engine. Aerospace Science and Technology, 43, 21-29.
Jaw, L. C., & Mattingly, J. D. (2009). Aircraft engine controls: Design, system analysis, and health monitoring. AIAA Education Series.
Vanini, Z. S., Khorasani, K., & Meskin, N. (2014). Fault detection and isolation of a dual spool gas turbine engine using dynamic neural networks and multiple model approach. Information Sciences, 259, 234-251.
Aygun, H., & Turan, O. (2021). Application of machine learning techniques to predict performance characteristics of a micro turbojet engine. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 93(5), 847-858.
Fentaye, A. D., Baheta, A. T., & Gilani, S. I. (2019). Gas turbine engine prognostics using Bayesian hierarchical models: A variational approach. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 122, 104-121.
Amozegar, M., & Khorasani, K. (2016). An ensemble of dynamic neural network identifiers for fault detection and isolation of gas turbine engines. Neural Computing and Applications, 27(5), 1413-1429.
Simon, D. L., & Garg, S. (2010). Optimal sensor selection for health monitoring of gas turbine engines. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 132(11), 111402.
Yan, W., & Yu, L. (2019). On accurate and reliable anomaly detection for gas turbine combustors: A deep learning approach. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 131, 1-18.
DeCastro, J. A., & Melcher, K. J. (2018). A study on data-driven predictive maintenance for gas turbine engines. ASME Turbo Expo 2018: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition.
Ljung, L. (1999). System identification: Theory for the user (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN: 978-0136566953
Wang, J., & Zhang, Q. (2021). Anomaly detection in gas turbine engines using deep autoencoders with LSTM layers. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 17(6), 4012-4021.
Liu, R., Yang, B., & Hauptmann, A. (2019). Ensemble learning for fault diagnosis in gas turbines using multi-sensor data. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 68(3), 987-998.
Widodo, A., & Yang, B.-S. (2007). Support vector machine in machine condition monitoring and fault diagnosis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 21(6), 2560-2574.
Gryllias, K. C., & Antoniadis, I. A. (2012). A Support Vector Machine approach for fault detection in rotating machinery. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 331(9), 2125-2139.
Zhang, X., & Zhou, J. (2018). Temporal support vector machines for time-series classification in industrial systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 65(5), 4267-4276.
Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785-794.
Zhang, Z., & Hong, W.-C. (2019). Application of XGBoost for fault diagnosis in mechanical systems. Energy Reports, 5, 1541-1550.
Tayarani-Bathaie, S. S., & Khorasani, K. (2014). Fault detection of gas turbine engines using dynamic neural networks. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 47(3), 5768-5773.
Yuan, M., & Peng, Y. (2019). Deep learning-based anomaly detection for mechanical systems: A review. Applied Soft Computing, 84, 105-123
Ellefsen, A. L., Bjørlykhaug, E., Æsøy, V., Ushakov, S., & Zhang, H. (2019). Remaining useful life predictions for turbofan engine degradation using semi-supervised deep architecture. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 183, 240-251.
Fentaye, A. D., Baheta, A. T., & Gilani, S. I. (2020). Performance monitoring of gas turbines using LSTM networks for predictive maintenance. Energy, 197, 117-129.
Nyulászi, L., et al. (2018). Multi-sensor fault detection in turbojet engines. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 15(2), 189-209.
Kim, S., & Cho, S. (2020). Fault-tolerant control of gas turbine engines using sliding mode control with adaptive parameters. Energies, 13(12), 3145.
Aygun, H., & Turan, O. (2021). Machine learning prediction of micro-turbojet performance using operational data. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 93(5), 847-858. DOI: 10.1108/AEAT-03-2021-0087
Pourbabaee, B., Meskin, N., & Khorasani, K. (2016). Sensor fault detection, isolation, and identification using multiple-model-based hybrid Kalman filter for gas turbine engines. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 24(4), 1185-1200. DOI: 10.1109/TCST.2015.2480003
Joly, R. B., Ogaji, S. O. T., Singh, R., & Probert, S. D. (2004). Gas-turbine diagnostics using artificial neural networks for a high bypass ratio military turbofan engine. Applied Energy, 78(4), 397-418.
Tahan, M., Tsoutsanis, E., Muhammad, M., & Abdul Karim, Z. A. (2017). Performance-based health monitoring, diagnostics and prognostics for condition-based maintenance of gas turbines: A review. Applied Energy, 198, 122-144.
Mattingly, J. D. (2006). Elements of propulsion: Gas turbines and rockets. AIAA Education Series.
Turan, O. (2012). Exergetic analysis of a small turbojet engine for unmanned aerial vehicle applications. Energy, 40(1), 172-181. [30] Kurzke, J. (2007). About simplifications in gas turbine performance calculations. ASME Turbo Expo 2007: Power for Land, Sea, and Air.
Camporeale, S. M., Fortunato, B., & Mastrovito, M. (2006). A modular code for real-time dynamic simulation of gas turbines in Simulink. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 128(3), 506-517.
Sankararaman, S., & Goebel, K. (2015). Why is the remaining useful life prediction uncertain? Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 7(1).
Lei, Y., Li, N., Guo, L., Li, N., Yan, T., & Lin, J. (2018). Machinery health prognostics: A systematic review from data acquisition to RUL prediction. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 104, 799-834.
Kurzke, J., & Halliwell, I. (2018). Gas turbine engine performance: Fundamentals and future. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 140(11), 112601.
Tsoutsanis, E., Meskin, N., Benammar, M., & Khorasani, K. (2014). A dynamic prognosis scheme for gas turbines using hybrid AI techniques. ASME Turbo Expo 2014: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition.
Seo, J. M., et al. (2017). Experimental investigation of a micro gas turbine with advanced diagnostics. Energy, 124, 9-18.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sukkur IBA Journal of Emerging Technologies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The SJET holds the rights of all the published papers. Authors are required to transfer copyrights to journal to make sure that the paper is solely published in SJET, however, authors and readers can freely read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and to use them for any other lawful purpose.

The SJET is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








